Skip to content
Workflow enablement for investment, advisory and wealth teams

AI that fits your firm. Not the other way around.

First-pass IC memos, diligence packs, and client deliverables — drafted from your firm’s template, model, and approved sources, with every material figure verified against an inspectable source.

Not a chat window. The Word, Excel, or PowerPoint deliverable your team already runs — verified before delivery, judgment left to your reviewer.

Built by a team spanning investment research, consulting, and enterprise AI. Meet the team →

The first conversation can use public data only.

Select a source to inspect

Illustrative workflow — not client work

Investment Committee Memo

Native Word deliverable (.docx)

Draft for review

Project Alder

Proposed acquisition of a vertical software business. First-pass memo prepared from approved context and public sources for senior review.

Revenue (Model_v12.xlsx)

$48.2m

EBITDA margin (Vendor export)

22.4%

  • Executive summary — mapped to firm template
  • Key investment considerations — web & market context
  • Principal risks — SEC 10-Q filing extract
  • Customer concentration — Q2 transcript call excerpt
  • Diligence notes & team observations — internal review pack

Workflow families for your firm

We rebuild recurring workflows around your firm’s context, sources, templates, deliverables, and review process — then train your team to run it.

01 · Research & MonitoringBuy-Side & Sell-Side

Investment Research & Monitoring

For buy-side and sell-side research teams.

What goes in?
Filings, transcripts, earnings releases, financial models, consensus data, public web research.
What comes out?
Post-earnings review, transcript summary, company or sector primer, thesis tracker, portfolio monitoring, research note.
Who reviews it?
Analyst, Senior Analyst, Portfolio Manager.
What the team learns to operate?
Run quarterly earnings updates, adapt thesis tracking logic, and manage topic watchlists.
02 · Transactions & DiligencePrivate Capital & Advisory

Transactions & Diligence

For investors, companies and transaction advisers.

What goes in?
CIM, data room files, operating models, diligence Q&A logs, licensed datasets, valuation comps.
What comes out?
Investment committee memo, information memorandum, diligence tracker, buyer/target map, valuation support pack.
Who reviews it?
Associate, VP, Principal, Investment Committee / Partner.
What the team learns to operate?
Maintain house memo templates, run Excel cell-level verification, and update diligence rules.
03 · Portfolio & ClientWealth, Asset Managers & RIAs

Portfolio & Client Communication

For wealth managers, family offices, RIAs, asset managers and OCIOs.

What goes in?
Portfolio holdings, manager research, benchmark returns, risk models, client IPS parameters.
What comes out?
Portfolio review pack, investment proposal, manager research note, client commentary, risk & exposure summary.
Who reviews it?
Wealth Advisor, Relationship Manager, Investment Committee, CIO.
What the team learns to operate?
Generate periodic portfolio packs, update risk criteria, and maintain client commentary rules.

Built by a team spanning investment research, consulting, and enterprise AI

J.P. Morgan
Goldman Sachs
Royal Bank of Scotland
D. E. Shaw & Co.
strategy&
BAIN & COMPANY
amazon
Meta

Prior employers — shown as background, not clients, partners, or endorsements.

A senior signs the document, not the chat.

One example of the workflow pattern: an investment committee memo built from a template, model, source documents and review rules.

Mode:

Illustrative workflow — not client work

Project Alder — Investment Committee Memo

Inspectable figures · Excel cell verification

Draft for review
Executive summary

Project Alder is a profitable vertical software business with recurring revenue, concentrated customer base, and clear cross-sell potential. The first-pass case is credible but depends on retention assumptions and margin progression that require diligence.

Financial overview — Click figure to inspect source
Cell-level Lineage Inspection — Excel SourceCell matches source
Workbook: Model_v12.xlsx · Sheet: RevenueBuildCell: C8
#A (Segment)B (2024)C (2025E)
6Subscription ARR$34.1m$41.0m
7Professional Services$6.8m$7.2m
8Total Revenue$40.9m$48,200,000

Re-verified against workbook during generation. Run record recorded in Evidence.json.

Key investment considerations
  • Recurring revenue with high renewal rates.
  • Cross-sell into an adjacent product line.
  • Margin path depends on sales hiring cadence.
Principal risks
  • Customer concentration above peer median.
  • Retention assumption sensitive to two large accounts.
Open diligence items
  • Customer retention detail
  • Sales pipeline by stage
  • Working capital seasonality
Reviewer checklist
  • Confirm revenue ties to model
  • Validate retention assumption
  • Mark judgment areas clearly

The goal is not an impressive draft. It is a deliverable the reviewer can inspect, correct, and confidently sign.

Illustrative Provenance Record

Example Run Record

Digest Matched
RUN_ID: #QVR-2026-0729-01Provenance Log

// Cell Lineage & Input Verifications

Model_v12.xlsxRevenueBuild!C8
$48.2m [Matched]
10Q_Q2_2025.pdfPage 14, ¶3
17.8% YoY [Verified]
Q2_Call_Transcript.txtPage 7 (Q&A)
Top 10 > 40% [Review Needed]
HASH:sha256:8f9b4c2e10a76d3f9b8a7c6e5d4c3b2a10f9e8d7c6b5a4f3e2d1c0b9a8f7e6d5

The digest identifies this displayed run record for lineage tracking. It is an internal snapshot, not an external certification.

Investment Research & Monitoring

Post-Earnings Research Review

Reported figures, KPI movements, and management commentary from filings, models and transcripts.

Open research review →
Transactions & Diligence

Project Alder — IC Memo

Native Word memo with Excel cell verification, full evidence report and reviewer checklist.

Open Project Alder evidence →
Portfolio & Client Communication

Portfolio Review Pack

Holdings, risk flags, thesis breaks and client commentary from benchmarks and portfolio data.

Open portfolio review →

Every figure above traces to a source a reviewer can open. If that is how your firm wants drafts delivered, the first conversation can start from one public workflow — no confidential data required.

Discuss a workflow

Send us the deliverable your team dreads drafting.

We’ll map the process, build the first working version, verify the output, and train your team to run it.

Discuss a workflow

No confidential documents are required for the first conversation.